What the numbers say, and the one that is going backwards
The National Housing Supply and Affordability Council is the independent body that advises the federal government on housing supply. Its August 2026 Quarterly Report tracks progress against the National Housing Accord's target of 1.2 million new homes, and the headline figures are genuinely better than the mood suggests: approvals up 26 per cent on the quarter before the Accord began, commencements up 15 per cent, 308,000 homes completed since it started, about a quarter of the target, and houses taking 10 per cent less time to build.
Read the footnotes and one of those is moving the wrong way. The Council's own March 2026 quarterly report put both approvals and commencements at 17 per cent above the pre-Accord quarter. Approvals have since gone from 17 to 26. Commencements have gone from 17 to 15. Permission to build is accelerating and actually starting is not, which is the gap that decides whether an approval ever becomes a home.
| Measure | March 2026 report | August 2026 report |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly building approvals, change since the Accord started | +17% | +26% |
| Quarterly commencements, change since the Accord started | +17% | +15% |
| When 1.2 million is reached | not stated here | December quarter 2030 |
The Council's comparisons are seasonally adjusted and use different base quarters for each measure: approvals compare June quarter 2026 with June quarter 2024, and commencements compare March quarter 2026 with June quarter 2024. The national highlights use data as at 6 August 2026.
What is pushing the date out
The Council is direct about costs. House construction costs rose 2 per cent in the June quarter of 2026 and are now 51 per cent higher than before the pandemic and its supply chain disruptions, with higher fuel and petrochemical prices from the conflict in the Middle East feeding through. It warns that rising costs may reduce the financial feasibility of some projects, and that softer sentiment and recent interest rate increases are likely to see some construction deferred.
Against that, the volume of work in the ground is at a record. There were 244,000 dwellings
under construction in the March quarter of 2026, and of that the report says: This was the
highest result since records began in 1984.
A record pipeline and a target that moves
further away are not a contradiction. They are what it looks like when the work under way is
large and the rate of new starts is not keeping pace with what the target needs.
The inquiry that reports on 30 September
The Senate resolved on 4 November 2025 to establish a Select Committee on Intergenerational Housing Inequity, which came into being on 17 March 2026. Submissions closed on 1 May and were extended to 15 May. Its final report is due by 30 September 2026.
Its terms of reference are broader than the usual supply argument. Alongside tax settings,
lending rules and public housing investment, the committee was asked to report on the
experience of intergenerational housing inequity on different population cohorts, including
but not limited to socio-economic, gender, geographical location, disability, ethnicity and
racial status
. Geographical location is in that list, which is what makes a national
inquiry a local one.
The Council made a submission of its own, number 7 of the 20 published, signed by its chair
Susan Lloyd-Hurwitz. It is short and it points the committee at the Council's April report,
with a summary worth reading twice: in 2025, the pace of homebuilding picked up and
completion times improved
, but rental affordability and purchase affordability
deteriorated further in 2025, adding to growing concerns about intergenerational housing
inequality.
Building faster has not yet made buying or renting easier.
Why this lands here
The Coast is the New South Wales council with more residents aged 65 and over than any other, 81,492 of them, as we reported on 30 August from the Bureau of Statistics' own data cube. Intergenerational housing inequity is, in the committee's framing, about what happens as housing wealth passes from one generation to the next, and about who is left holding rent instead. A local government area with the state's largest older population and a long commuter belt is, on the committee's own list of cohorts, exactly the kind of place the answer differs in.
What the report will actually say is unknown, and we are not going to guess it. What is knowable today is the date, 30 September, and the questions it was handed. We will read it when it lands.